PAGE 1
A comment rom the Western Standard article
FreedomHawk 37 mins ago
The judiciary has strayed far beyond its proper constitutional boundaries. Courts exist to interpret and enforce the laws as written by elected legislatures—not to rewrite them, invent new constraints, or substitute judicial preferences for the democratic will of the people.
In this instance, a judge appears to have inserted themselves into a core democratic process: Alberta citizens exercising their right under provincial law to petition for a referendum on the province's future. By attempting to block or invalidate such citizen-driven initiatives on the grounds that they might implicate Treaty rights, the court risks transforming itself from neutral arbiter into active participant in shaping political outcomes. This isn't enforcement of existing law; it's an overreach that effectively lets unelected judges veto the voices of hundreds of thousands of Albertans who pay the taxes, build the economy, and live under the province's authority every day.
Treaties in Canada were solemn agreements entered into between First Nations and the Crown—the federal government in right of Canada—not the provincial government of Alberta or its residents directly. Provinces lack the constitutional power to unilaterally alter or extinguish those federal treaty obligations, just as a municipality couldn't negotiate its own foreign trade deals. Any meaningful change to the federation, including questions of sovereignty or separation, ultimately engages federal responsibilities and the broader Canadian constitutional framework. Provincial citizens debating and voting on their preferred direction does not magically rewrite those treaties or strip away federal duties.
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Renewing subscription to pay direct and take advantage of the discount. Go to "contact us" the option to pay by credit card shows up and you can renew using the codes.
PAGE 2
What cannot stand is the notion that the democratic aspirations of Alberta's people—expressed through lawful petition and potential referendum—must be halted indefinitely simply because certain groups raise treaty concerns.
Democracy isn't optional when it becomes inconvenient or touches sensitive historical relationships. If a referendum question or process truly conflicts with higher constitutional norms, that should be resolved through clear, predictable rules applied equally, not through ad hoc judicial injunctions that freeze public discourse.
The proper remedy for complex constitutional questions lies with elected governments negotiating in good faith, potentially involving Parliament, or ultimately the Supreme Court of Canada in a measured way—not lower courts preemptively shutting down citizen initiatives.
Albertans deserve a government that vigorously defends provincial jurisdiction and the democratic rights of its residents against such encroachments. If a specific ...