We are committed to sharing news, stories, events and opinions that ensures our province stays free, united and independent from the overreach of the Federal government.
All are welcome and respectful debate is encouraged. Please join with the intention of participating. Proceeds are donated.
If the courts block Elections Alberta from counting the signatures, the path forward remains.
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Renewing subscription to pay direct and take advantage of the discount. Go to "contact us" the option to pay by credit card shows up and you can renew using the codes.
https://open.substack.com/pub/blendrnews/p/the-death-of-democracy-in-canada?
“From the outside, Canada still looks like a functioning democracy. Elections are held on schedule, Parliament convenes, and parties campaign against one another. The trouble is that almost none of it functions as advertised.
Today, Canada’s “democracy” operates as a procedural husk — a system that retains every formal structure of democratic governance being repurposed to serve the political class rather than the public it claims to represent.
Over the past five years, the governing party has called elections to bury active investigations into national security breaches and financial corruption. Parliament sat for just sixteen percent of the available days while MPs collected full salaries and per diems for the other eighty-four.
More than 121,000 ballots went uncounted in a single federal election. A riding was decided by one vote after an Elections Canada employee printed the wrong postal code on dozens...
PAGE 1
A comment rom the Western Standard article
FreedomHawk 37 mins ago
Just did AI to search a write this. Looks the the Judge just overstepped and may of broke the law.
The judiciary has strayed far beyond its proper constitutional boundaries. Courts exist to interpret and enforce the laws as written by elected legislatures—not to rewrite them, invent new constraints, or substitute judicial preferences for the democratic will of the people.
In this instance, a judge appears to have inserted themselves into a core democratic process: Alberta citizens exercising their right under provincial law to petition for a referendum on the province's future. By attempting to block or invalidate such citizen-driven initiatives on the grounds that they might implicate Treaty rights, the court risks transforming itself from neutral arbiter into active participant in shaping political outcomes. This isn't enforcement of existing law; it's an overreach that effectively lets unelected judges veto the ...
