We are committed to sharing news, stories, events and opinions that ensures our province stays free, united and independent from the overreach of the Federal government.
All are welcome and respectful debate is encouraged. Please join with the intention of participating. Proceeds are donated.
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/comparing-federal-fiscal-plans-is-carney-government-truly-taking-different-approach
The hyperbolic managed decline of Canada:
“By 2029/30, the Carney government projects that the total federal debt will reach $2.9 trillion (79.0% of GDP), whereas the Trudeau government had only planned to reach $2.6 trillion ($266.4 billion less and only 71.7% of GDP).
Rather than take a new approach, this analysis reveals the Carney government will instead continue, and exacerbate, the same fiscal policies as the Trudeau government.”
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Nenshi is using horse paste AKA Ivermectin
Alberta MLA
@EricBouchard calls out Alberta NDP leader for labeling Ivermectin "quakery" when people used it to treat Covid, but acknowledged it's benefits for Nenshi when he used it.
It's time Nenshi saves face and admits, Ivermectin is actually very Safe & Effective.
Friggers…..
The federal government has launched an appeal with the Supreme Court of Canada to defend its use of the Emergencies Act in 2022 in response to the Freedom Convoy.
The Federal Court of Appeal rejected in January Ottawa’s appeal against a 2024 lower court decision after finding the lower court had “correctly determined” the declaration of a public order emergency was unreasonable and that parts of the order infringed on Charter rights related to the freedom of expression.
Ottawa filed an application on March 17 to have an appeal heard at the Supreme Court, arguing that the lower courts had incorrectly reviewed the use of the Emergencies Act, which the government said was used because it believed the Freedom Convoy protest of 2022 presented a threat to Canada’s national security.
Court Case
The court action was launched by some of the protesters and civil liberties groups who had argued the federal government’s response violated Charter rights, and that actions such as freezing the bank ...
