Benita Petersen posted this on FB
The entity that has initiated legal action against Dr. William Makis is the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Alberta.
In the legal documentation pictured below, the CPSA expresses opposition to Dr. William Makis using the title of "Dr." and also expresses opposition to him providing health services and/or prescribing anything.
The College of Physicians and Surgeons in Alberta, or CPSA, is governed by a council that includes physicians, public members, and representatives from Alberta’s medical schools. Funding is provided mainly through physician fees, although special projects may receive funding through various grant programs.
Who sits on CPSA Council?
A combination of physicians, Albertans and learners all bring their unique experiences and perspectives to CPSA Council. Members of CPSA council include:
The council currently includes the following individuals:
ELECTED PHYSICIAN MEMBERS
The CPSA has meetings coming up on September 18 and 19 and on December 4 and 5.
One way to connect with the council chair is via email:
If you are interested in inquiring as to why the council of the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Alberta has initiated legal action against Dr. William Makis, I suggest messaging each member of the board directly via the website (link below). I do not suggest expressing hostility in your messaging; I suspect you will get better results if you merely come across as inquisitive. Be sure to be polite and professional in the tone of your inquiry. That is how you will get the best results.
https://cpsa.ca/about-cpsa/governance/council/councillors/
Premier Danielle Smith does not control the CPSA council. The CPSA council operates independently. It is unreasonable for Dr. William Makis to blame Premier Danielle Smith for the legal action that was initiated by CPSA.
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
https://c2cjournal.ca/2025/10/one-country-two-markets-the-shaky-promise-and-unfair-burden-of-decarbonized-oil/
“The obligation about to be imposed upon Western Canada’s energy sector to produce and transport ‘decarbonized’ oil will place it under a material – if not ruinous – regulatory and financial handicap in world markets. Meanwhile, Eastern Canadian refiners would be allowed to continue importing oil from the United States and offshore jurisdictions.
This might cause one to wonder whether Smith’s musings about a “grand bargain” are anything more than a back-of-the-envelope guesstimate conjuring a kind of political unicorn, a federally-approved export pipeline carrying hypothetically decarbonized oil. And this brings us to the second major question, one that stabs at the heart of the economies of Alberta and Saskatchewan: why is it important that Western Canada’s oil be “decarbonized” at all, when that requirement is not imposed upon oil imported to Eastern Canada, much of it from countries...
Trying to buy replacement lightbulbs (incandescent) for wall sconces that I bought from Wayfair ... note they came with incandescent lightbulbs that's one reason why I bought the sconces. Turns out Wayfair doesn't sell replacement bulbs for this light fixture!!! Un-bloody-real. No mention of that fact when I bought the sconces. Now I have to find replacements elsewhere - and when I do I'll be buying all of them!
Seriously...I am so tired of mandates and top-down agendas. The PTB are always trying to fix a nonexistent problem with a stupid solution that causes it's own problems.
Leave me alone, let the free market dictate results, and while we're at it don't even mandate seatbelts!!
I'm so done. It's tiring trying to be a free citizen with data to back it up.
Rant over. Thank you for your attention to this matter. 😉