An excellent evaluation.
Copied ⬇️
So no surprise, Mark Carney is the new leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. Having set the contest entry threshold at a lofty $350,000 and outspent the others fair and square, he is now cleared to be sworn in as the next Prime Minister of Canada.
There are two things to be said.
The first is to Mr. Carney. We’ll say it just once: Mr. Carney, congratulations from western Canada.
But enjoy the moment. For, tomorrow we need to talk about oil, gas, pipelines and what lanes the government you now head may legitimately occupy. If you mean as Liberal leader to continue your predecessor’s policy of putting Alberta out of business, it will be a tough discussion.
The second thing we must say is to the string-pullers in the Liberal party. This was your chance to restore mainstream thinking to your party. Not necessarily to become conservatives or even blue liberals.
But you could have pivoted to things to which common-sense Canadians could say ‘yes.’
Instead you gave us four candidates who represented your old style of thinking. The choice was nothing more than who could best channel the departing Justin Trudeau.
You gave us Mark Carney.
Time enough to see whether Mr. Carney is any more effective as a political campaigner than Michael Ignatieff, the public intellectual you put against Stephen Harper in 2011. It’s hard to say. So far, you’ve barely let the man speak in public and then only to state-funded media.
But on Canada’s behalf, here is your really big mistake.
You have positioned yourself as a party ready to defend Canada at a time when its future as a sovereign state is threatened.
Your narrative is that the threat comes from an aggressive, alpha male US president. An alpha male president, that is, who hates bankers and is committed to overturning globalism — which will be the practical effect of putting the United States behind a tariff barrier.
So to confront the orange-haired iconoclast who has also pulled the US out of UNESCO, the World Health Organization and the Paris Accords, you have chosen Mark Carney?
A technocrat who has administered not one central bank but two, was very recently the UN Ambassador for Climate Change and is in fact a platinum-level globalist? That is, he glides easily through the carpeted halls of the World Economic Forum, Chatham House, the Brookings Institution and the Group of 30… He is a pillar of one-worlders like the Bilderberger Group.
Somebody who embodies everything Trump isn't, is your champion against Trump?
Nobody says that to contend with Trump, you must be like Trump. But, when David went up against Goliath, at least he had a sling and a handful of pebbles.
What’s Mark Carney got?
This is not going to end well.
This is not even going to begin well. Carney is about to get creamed.
Liberals, do yourselves and all of us a favour. Go early to an election and lose it.
Let somebody else deal with Donald Trump.
https://www.westernstandard.news/opinion/hannaford-mark-carney-inherits-the-poisoned-chalice/62894
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Renewing subscription to pay direct and take advantage of the discount. Go to "contact us" the option to pay by credit card shows up and you can renew using the codes.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM
Watching the drama unfold around the referendum discussion is, to me, just so incredibly silly.
I cannot believe we are at a point where we are seriously entertaining theatrics about whether citizens should even be allowed to pose a question, instead of having mature discussions about what the question actually means, the potential consequences, the legal realities, the risks, the benefits, and the broader future of the province and country.
That is what democracy is supposed to be.
Not fear of discussion.
Not attempts to shut conversations down before they even happen.
Not treating citizens like they are incapable of hearing ideas, thinking critically, and making decisions for themselves.
A referendum question is not automatic implementation. It is a mechanism to gauge public support and force public discussion on an issue of significant importance. Democracies should not be afraid of asking questions. If anything, they should be afraid of preventing them.
If...
From FB. Berta Dad
Jeff Rath’s behaviour toward Danielle Smith is not a good look for this movement, and he does not speak for me.
When this started, I had respect for him. But as this has played out, it has become harder to ignore what appears to be a push for power inside the movement, not a sincere focus on Alberta independence.
Danielle Smith is a major reason Albertans were even able to collect signatures in the first place. Compared to any other premier in this country, I believe she has been the strongest one standing up for her province.
I will not forget her accomplishments.
She stood up for parental rights when others wanted schools keeping parents in the dark.
She took action against political ideology being pushed in classrooms.
She made sure kids got back to school when the system tried to hold families hostage.
She has strengthened Alberta Sheriffs and continued exploring ways to free Alberta from relying on the RCMP.
And that is only part of it.
This movement should be ...