https://www.foxnews.com/media/canadians-fed-up-says-alberta-lawyer-leading-delegation-washington-statehood-talks
Fox News has picked up the story:
“A Canadian lawyer is leading efforts to explore the possibility of Alberta joining the U.S., as President Donald Trump continues to push for closer ties with Canada’s energy-rich province.
"There’s literally hundreds of Albertans that are reaching out and volunteering to join our delegation," Jeffrey Rath said Thursday on "FOX & Friends."
👉Rath and a small group of Albertans are planning to travel to Washington, D.C., to discuss potential pathways for Alberta, including 👉independence with economic ties to the U.S., territorial status,
or full statehood.
He believes the movement will gain traction as dissatisfaction with Canada’s federal leadership grows.
t’s a steering committee of people that are looking to come to Washington on an exploratory basis and meet with a representative appointed by President Trump," Rath explained.
"To explore the benefits of either Alberta becoming an independent sovereign nation with economic union to the United States, becoming a U.S. territory, or pursuing full statehood."
Rath argues that Alberta, home to 4.9 million people and a major hub for oil, manufacturing, and construction, has little in common with Canada’s political elite.
"They’ve completely lost their way," he said, criticizing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration.
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Renewing subscription to pay direct and take advantage of the discount. Go to "contact us" the option to pay by credit card shows up and you can renew using the codes.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/the-water-wars-have-begun/
“The Forum states that its annual meeting will concentrate on “freshwater access and management, blue food security and ocean protection.” Those words may sound harmless to anyone who has never studied how political power actually expands, but management always means that someone will decide who receives a resource, how much they may use, what price they must pay, and under what conditions access may be withdrawn.”
Everybody is asking the same thing these days, What Happened to Danielle Smith? Even the people who never questioned her before have started to question what she's doing, me included. People like Derek from Unacceptable Fringe, John Bolton, Leighton Grey all ask the same thing, What Changed? I think that Carney promised her something and in order to get that, she had to make concessions like accepting Net Zero, increased carbon tax, laying off the mass immigration complaint, accepting all the No Oil bills. That's not who or what I voted for. I didn't like her when she was Wild Rose and it took me a long time to warm up to her, just like it's taken a long time for me to question her motives. I feel stupid for trusting her in the first place. My question at this point is who else is there?