We are committed to sharing news, stories, events and opinions that ensures our province stays free, united and independent from the overreach of the Federal government.
All are welcome and respectful debate is encouraged. Please join with the intention of participating. Proceeds are donated.
Guess she got the message and now the backpeddling begins.
It has come to our attention that certain individuals or organizations are attempting to misuse the 1905 Committee’s brand to create false narratives about our purpose. Since our inception, we have faced numerous attacks, seemingly from those who wish to discredit our mission by spreading fabrications and misinformation.
For those familiar with our work, you know our message has always been clear: we are committed to promoting principled governance, sound policies, and holding the government accountable. We believe that a promise made must be a promise kept. Politicians are accountable to the people who elected them, and they must act in the best interest of all Albertans, upholding truth and the rule of law.
Albertans are frustrated with the cycle of empty speeches, broken promises, and poor performance from our elected officials. Too often, we hear excuses for why they cannot deliver on their commitments. But there comes a time when enough is enough. Real change requires sustained public pressure, and the 1905 Committee has been applying that pressure. Our efforts have not gone unnoticed. However, instead of addressing the issues we've raised, some have chosen the easier path of attacking us with false narratives and outright lies.
To set the record straight, we want to address the recent rumors head-on. The claims that the 1905 Committee has paid leftists to join the UCP to vote against Danielle Smith are false and defamatory. This raises a critical question however: who is spreading these lies, and why?
As an organization we value individual freedom and respect each person’s right to vote according to their conscience. The 1905 Committee has always asked for your support on our policies, but we have never dictated how anyone should vote on the issue of Danielle Smith’s leadership review. That decision is yours alone.
In today's climate, challenging the government's narrative is risky, as those in power often retaliate against those who dare to dissent.
While there are groups and individuals that may seek to remove Danielle Smith, this is not a directive of the 1905 Committee. Our intent is to hold government to account, regardless of leadership.
Thank you for your continued support in standing up for principled governance and the future of Alberta.
Sincerely,
1905 Committee
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Renewing subscription to pay direct and take advantage of the discount. Go to "contact us" the option to pay by credit card shows up and you can renew using the codes.
Well said and an interesting perspective from The Alberta Institute.
Yesterday, an Alberta Court of King’s Bench judge issued a ruling that should deeply concern every Albertan who believes citizens should have the right to participate directly in democracy and public debate.
Justice Shaina Leonard - appointed in 2020 by then federal Liberal Justice Minister David Lametti - quashed the entirety of the Stay Free Alberta citizen initiative petition seeking a referendum on Alberta independence.
But the ruling doesn't just affect the separation referendum - it is a dramatic, troubling, and frankly ridiculous expansion of the duty for governments to consult with indigenous people, that will have massive ramifications not just for any future citizens' initiative petition on any issue, but also for every single piece of legislation that any government anywhere in Canada proposes in the future.
It is really, really hard to overstate the massive implications this ruling could have, if it's allowed to stand.
In short, Justice Leonard found that Elections Alberta’s Chief ...
Premier Smith had better do more than filing a multi-year stalling appeal.
She is able to bypass the judge and put the SFA question on the referendum vote in October.
If UCP member Albertan’s are forced to decide between the Independence Movement and Premier Smith, she will loose. Signing an unnecessary tax adding fake MOU agreement update with Carney tommorow will also add to her demise.
She should be stalling this unnecessary, detrimental, ideological tax burden Carney Industrial Taxation scheme.
“The referendum question around separation, filed with Elections Alberta in December 2025, asks, “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”
Premier Smith said at a press conference later in the day that her government would be appealing the court’s ruling.
“Although our government does support Alberta remaining in Canada, we think that today’s decision by the court will deny the opportunity to well over 300,000 ...
