We are committed to sharing news, stories, events and opinions that ensures our province stays free, united and independent from the overreach of the Federal government.
All are welcome and respectful debate is encouraged. Please join with the intention of participating. Proceeds are donated.
When WE got rid of Kenney with the majority of the push coming from groups like FB’s Holding MLA’s Accountable, they took credit for that piggy backing on it. NOW they are “calling for a referendum” regarding the APP? DS has already stated there will be a referendum once the figures have been given to the UCP, WHY is David not giving the party credit where credit is due? Maybe it’s just a bad day but he annoys me.
“Take Back Alberta
We hope you've had a good week so far. As you can see there is a lot going on with TBA. (And a lot more in the works, we will be announcing soon).
Please considering donating to support the work we do. Without your support, we couldn't pay for the tools we use for the events and projects we are working on!
1) Alberta Pension Plan
We launched a petition two weeks ago, to call for a referendum on an Alberta Pension Plan. At the time of writing this email, we have over 10000 signatures. As impressive as that may be, our goal is far higher.
If you haven't, please sign the petition and definitely send it to your friends”.
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Renewing subscription to pay direct and take advantage of the discount. Go to "contact us" the option to pay by credit card shows up and you can renew using the codes.
PAGE 2
What cannot stand is the notion that the democratic aspirations of Alberta's people—expressed through lawful petition and potential referendum—must be halted indefinitely simply because certain groups raise treaty concerns.
Democracy isn't optional when it becomes inconvenient or touches sensitive historical relationships. If a referendum question or process truly conflicts with higher constitutional norms, that should be resolved through clear, predictable rules applied equally, not through ad hoc judicial injunctions that freeze public discourse.
The proper remedy for complex constitutional questions lies with elected governments negotiating in good faith, potentially involving Parliament, or ultimately the Supreme Court of Canada in a measured way—not lower courts preemptively shutting down citizen initiatives.
Albertans deserve a government that vigorously defends provincial jurisdiction and the democratic rights of its residents against such encroachments. If a specific ...
PAGE 1
A comment rom the Western Standard article
FreedomHawk 37 mins ago
Just did AI to search a write this. Looks the the Judge just overstepped and may of broke the law.
The judiciary has strayed far beyond its proper constitutional boundaries. Courts exist to interpret and enforce the laws as written by elected legislatures—not to rewrite them, invent new constraints, or substitute judicial preferences for the democratic will of the people.
In this instance, a judge appears to have inserted themselves into a core democratic process: Alberta citizens exercising their right under provincial law to petition for a referendum on the province's future. By attempting to block or invalidate such citizen-driven initiatives on the grounds that they might implicate Treaty rights, the court risks transforming itself from neutral arbiter into active participant in shaping political outcomes. This isn't enforcement of existing law; it's an overreach that effectively lets unelected judges veto the ...
