When WE got rid of Kenney with the majority of the push coming from groups like FB’s Holding MLA’s Accountable, they took credit for that piggy backing on it. NOW they are “calling for a referendum” regarding the APP? DS has already stated there will be a referendum once the figures have been given to the UCP, WHY is David not giving the party credit where credit is due? Maybe it’s just a bad day but he annoys me.
“Take Back Alberta
We hope you've had a good week so far. As you can see there is a lot going on with TBA. (And a lot more in the works, we will be announcing soon).
Please considering donating to support the work we do. Without your support, we couldn't pay for the tools we use for the events and projects we are working on!
1) Alberta Pension Plan
We launched a petition two weeks ago, to call for a referendum on an Alberta Pension Plan. At the time of writing this email, we have over 10000 signatures. As impressive as that may be, our goal is far higher.
If you haven't, please sign the petition and definitely send it to your friends”.
Use these discount codes to get 1/2 price subscription.
Monthly FREEALBERTA -$1
Annual GWDISCOUNT- $12
Thank God there is one judge following law & common sense than to take someone’s livelihood away from them, rather than following ideological crap!
Freedom Convoy organizer Chris Barber will be able to keep his long-haul truck “Big Red” after a judge dismissed the Crown’s application to seize the vehicle used in the 2022 protest.
“The Crown’s application for the forfeiture of Big Red is denied, the court having found forfeiture of Big Red to be disproportionate,” Justice Heather Perkins-McVey said on Dec. 19.
Perkins-McVey said while the truck was used as offence-related property for the protest, forfeiture would have been disproportionate because the truck is used for Barber’s business and there is “no evidence” that Big Red will be used in future criminal offences.
“On the contrary, the evidence suggests that Big Red will continue to be used for its legitimate and intended commercial purposes as a work truck in the future, much the same way as it has been used since its purchase ...
Another example of the arrogance of Jeff Rath 🤦🏻♀️ (taking credit for Danielle talking about a pipeline through Washington instead of BC) - like my mother often said to me “it’s not what you say it’s how you say it” and on one hand he says he's invited to a "billionaire club meeting" that he can't say anything about because of Charter House rules and then he goes on to say what it was about! This "lawyer" seems unbelievably compromised in so many ways. IMHO