We are committed to sharing news, stories, events and opinions that ensures our province stays free, united and independent from the overreach of the Federal government.
All are welcome and respectful debate is encouraged. Please join with the intention of participating. Proceeds are donated.
You have to ask yourself what the heck took so long to uncover that Buffy isn’t who she claimed to be, her race at least. I have questions.
1. Why now, is it a case of more “white people bad, every other race gooood.”
2. Did she pay taxes on the money she earned and did she enjoy all of the benefits of having the Indigenous race card?
3. Why didn’t the Piapott Cree nation refute her claims.
4. Why didn’t her sister-in-law speak out before now.
5. Why didn’t ALL the other FN organizations look into her claims.
6. If she isn’t Indian what race is she, could be a gypsy?
Kinda looks like a witch hunt for unknown reasons (to me) on this one.
https://www.cbc.ca/newsinteractives/features/buffy-sainte-marie
He’s so right! (In more ways than one. 😆) At least in the US there is at least one conservative news outlet Fox). In Canada we have nothing like that and with CRTC being controlled by the Liberal government, we aren’t likely to get one. They only way to get a conservative view of anything is by going to independent media. So many people just go to the 3-stooges-TV (CBC, CTV and Global) for their news because it’s what they are used to and it’s easy.
Copied ⬇️
When the CBC dislikes a person or an opinion, our taxpayer-funded broadcaster calls it “controversial.” In CBC-speak, “controversial” means conservative, libertarian, religious, traditionalist, classical liberal, or otherwise not in line with woke ideology. For the CBC, there is nothing “controversial” about a man who “identifies” as a woman having an absolute right to enter women’s washrooms and other female spaces. Only those who seek to protect safe spaces for women are “controversial.”
As millions mourn the ...
Danielle, get us the h*ll out of this insane asylum called Canada!! Please!
Copied ⬇️
The Trudeau government paid $45,076 for in-house polling that found most Canadians don’t care about Ottawa’s attempt to brand plastics as toxic.
According to the Department of Environment survey, 51% of Canadians are “neutral consumers” who have no strong views on the issue.
Blacklock's Reporter said just 44% described themselves as “engaged environmentalists” willing to spend more or change their habits, while 4% were outright skeptics and 2% said they would only back regulations if they didn’t raise costs.
Despite the lack of enthusiasm, cabinet in 2021 declared all plastic manufactured items toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, lumping plastics in with asbestos and lead.
A Federal Court judge struck down the order in 2023 as unconstitutional, saying Ottawa had no evidence every plastic product posed a danger. The ruling is under appeal.
Instead of backing down, Ottawa is ...
My letter to Premier Smith this morning. This whole digital ID has me pissed off. While I like to see proof of citizenship, isn't that what your ID already tells them? ID can still be faked even with proof of citizenship. I welcome your thoughts.
Premier Smith, I'm a huge supporter of yours, but this highway to hell under the guise of digital wallet, starting with citizenship on our driver's license is absolutely not what we voted for at last year's AGM.
Please listen to your base, we don't want digital ID. This only leads to the government controlling our behaviour and our information. The government has no business poking around in my personal information and this is exactly what it will lead to. Next up carbon scores, social credit scores, CBDC, 15 minute cities. If you think for a second that as a private citizen your movement won't be not only monitored, but controlled, you haven't been paying attention. Check out Oxford England. You're fined if you leave your designated area.
...
